Clay logoFunding timeline

Clay

Clay is the New York AI platform for sales and marketing teams that created the 'GTM engineering' category, combining prospect data, AI research agents and automated growth workflows.

Clay logo
Founded
2017
Headquarters
New York, NY
Founders
Kareem Amin (CEO); Nicolae Rusan; Varun Anand (COO, joined 2021)
Sector
AI-powered go-to-market (GTM) platform — data, AI agents, workflow automation
Product
Claygent AI agents, Sculptor workflow builder, 150+ premium data sources, CRM enrichment
Latest valuation
US$7B pre-money (reported)
Customers
10,000+
ARR
~US$100M (Dec 2025)
Rounds recorded
9
Total raised
$277M

Funding Timeline

Every disclosed equity round for Clay, newest to oldest, with lead and participating investors where reported. Data is stored oldest-first; the timeline is displayed latest-first.

  1. Aug 31, 2026

    New Round

    at $7B valuationLatest
    Led by Wellington Management

    Axios reported (31 August 2026) that Clay had inked a new round led by Wellington Management at a US$7B pre-money valuation. Round size undisclosed; as of 9 September 2026 neither Clay nor Wellington had formally confirmed the close — treat the figure as reported deal terms rather than a confirmed outcome.

  2. Jan 28, 2026

    Employee Tender

    $55Mat $5B valuation
    Led by DST Global

    Employee tender led by DST Global at a US$5B valuation, nearly double the Series C mark seven months earlier.

    Source ↗

  3. Aug 5, 2025

    Series C

    $100Mat $3.1B valuation
    Led by CapitalGMeritech CapitalSequoia CapitalFirst Round CapitalBoxGroupBoldstart VenturesSapphire Ventures

    Led by CapitalG (Alphabet's independent growth fund); Sapphire Ventures joined as a new investor. More than doubled the valuation from the January extension. Total funding reached US$204M.

    Source ↗

  4. May 1, 2025

    Employee Tender

    $20Mat $1.5B valuation

    Sequoia-led secondary tender allowing most employees to sell some shares.

    Source ↗

  5. Jan 1, 2025

    Series B Extension

    $40Mat $1.25B valuation
    Led by Meritech Capital

    Pre-emptive extension led by Meritech Capital, lifting the price to US$1.25B seven months after the US$500M Series B.

    Source ↗

  6. Jun 1, 2024

    Series B

    $46Mat $500M valuation
    Led by Meritech CapitalSequoia CapitalFirst Round CapitalBoldstart Ventures

    Led by Meritech Capital as Clay entered its hypergrowth phase.

    Source ↗

  7. Jan 1, 2023

    Series A

    $13.5M

    Led by Sequoia (Alfred Lin) as Clay began building the GTM-engineering category.

    Source ↗

  8. Jan 1, 2021

    Seed

    $2.5M
    Led by First Round CapitalBoxGroupBoldstart Ventures

    Led by First Round Capital.

    Source ↗

  9. Jun 1, 2017

    Pre-Seed

    Led by BoxGroup

    Backing from NYC-based BoxGroup (David Tisch) at the company's founding.

    Source ↗

The Story Behind the Numbers

Inventing the GTM-engineering Category

Clay's founders (Amin and Rusan met at McGill studying electrical engineering, built and sold Frame, then took product roles at Dow Jones/WSJ) shipped Clay in February 2022 and effectively created two new categories: a 'claygency' services economy (160+ vetted partners) and the 'GTM Engineer' job title — 3,000+ open roles by January 2026 at a US$127K median salary. Customers like OpenAI, Anthropic, Canva, Intercom and Rippling use it to run outbound on the highest-quality data foundation.

Revenue Hypergrowth Without Touching the Bank

Clay grew from US$500K ARR in 2022 to ~US$100M ARR by December 2025, with >200% NRR among enterprise accounts. After the August 2025 Series C, founder Amin told the press the company 'hasn't touched' the last round — the definitional capital-efficiency story of the AI GTM wave, and a reason Wellington's reported US$7B pre-money bet is on category ownership rather than current revenue.

A Valuation Arc With No Product Pivot

Clay's ladder — US$500M (mid-2024) → US$1.25B → US$1.5B → US$3.1B (2025) → US$5B (Jan 2026) → a reported US$7B (Aug 2026) — rerated roughly 14x in two years without any strategic pivot, pricing AI-powered sales/marketing tooling as one of the defining software categories of the current AI cycle. Wellington's reported involvement mirrors its large late-stage checks into AI-native software (e.g. Glean) rather than waiting for IPOs.

The Caveat on the US$7B Round

Unlike Harvey's September round, Clay's US$7B deal was still, as of 9 September 2026, an Axios-reported agreement in progress: round size and Wellington's stake undisclosed, and neither Clay nor Wellington had confirmed a close. Reported late-stage terms sometimes shift before finalizing, so the figure is carried here as reported rather than confirmed.

More in the Atlas

Clay's lead investors are profiled in the Investor Atlas when their firms join the directory. Track who backs every frontier AI round on the Funding Leaderboard.

Frequently asked questions

Why do employee tenders keep appearing between Clay's priced rounds?

As pressure valves for a valuation rising faster than liquidity events: Sequoia ran a US$20M tender at US$1.5B in May 2025, DST Global another at US$5B in January 2026 — each within months of a primary round, letting staff sell into the ladder. A DST-led tender is itself unusual, since secondaries typically anchor on existing insiders rather than growth funds paying for observational access.

How has Clay reached a reported US$7B on only ~US$204M raised?

Through sequencing and efficiency: US$204M total against a reported US$7B pre-money is a ~34x markup on capital, versus roughly 14x for Lovable (~US$950M raised at US$13.3B). ARR grew from US$500K (2022) to ~US$100M (December 2025) with >200% enterprise NRR, and founder Amin said the Series C was never touched — the reason Wellington's round could be negotiated from strength rather than need.

Why did Alphabet's growth fund lead Clay's Series C?

Part of a wider consolidation: CapitalG led at US$3.1B in August 2025 — more than doubling January's US$1.25B extension — and co-led Lovable's Series B, while Sapphire Ventures, also in Harvey's September 2026 round, joined the syndicate. The same institutions now recur across category-owning GTM and vertical-AI platforms, betting on category ownership rather than current revenue.

What is a 'GTM engineer,' and why does it matter to the valuation?

A job title Clay effectively created: 3,000+ open roles by January 2026 at a US$127K median salary, plus a 160+ partner 'claygency' services economy. That category ownership is the load-bearing wall of Wellington's reported US$7B pre-money — a bet on the category, not the ~US$100M ARR. No other company in this dataset can claim a labor-market category as its moat.

What does a 14x rerating in two years, with no pivot, tell you?

That Clay priced the category, not a strategy change: US$500M (June 2024) to US$1.25B to US$1.5B to US$3.1B to US$5B (January 2026) to a reported US$7B pre-money (August 2026). Mistral needed a compute-landlord pivot for its ~90x in three years; Zhipu's ~10x came post-IPO in seven months. Clay's rerating happened entirely on the private board with the same product DNA throughout.