Buildots
Check work captured on a construction site against the building plan.
Buildots Funding History
Buildots develops construction progress-tracking software using computer vision and footage from hardhat-mounted cameras. It compares site activity with building information models and schedules to maintain a digital view of project status, helping construction teams monitor work against their plans.
Company Overview
Founded 2018 · Tel Aviv, Israel
Official WebsiteBuildots Funding Timeline
Series E (Reported; Officially Unnamed)
US$130 million
Buildots tied the financing to broader deployment of its construction software, with data center construction named as a priority in the announcement. Calcalist reported that the round valued Buildots at nearly $1 billion.
Led by O.G. Venture Partners. Participation included Qumra Capital, Lightspeed Venture Partners, Intel Capital, Viola Growth.
Source · prnewswire.com ↗Series D
US$45 million
Buildots said the funding would expand its progress-tracking platform to cover more of the construction lifecycle.
Led by Qumra Capital. Participation included TLV Partners.
Source · prnewswire.com ↗Series C
US$60 million
Buildots was extending its site-monitoring software into scheduling and payments so more construction teams could work from the same on-site records.
Led by Viola Growth, O.G. Venture Partners. Participation included Lightspeed Venture Partners, TLV Partners.
Source · buildots.com ↗Series B
US$30 million
Buildots was bringing computer vision to construction sites, giving project teams a way to track progress against plans using images from the site.
Led by Lightspeed Venture Partners. Participation included TLV Partners, Future Energy Ventures.
Source · techcrunch.com ↗
Buildots Founding Team
Roy Danon, Aviv Leibovici, and Yakir Sudry founded Buildots to help construction teams track progress on job sites. Danon became CEO, Leibovici led product as CPO, and Sudry led engineering as CTO.
Buildots Products
Buildots Company Development
Making Captured Footage Useful to the Project Schedule
Buildots connects imagery collected by hardhat-mounted cameras to a building model and construction schedule. The result turns a record of what workers saw on site into a way for project teams to track whether planned work is actually in place.
Buildots Competitive Landscape
Site Records Versus Schedule Reconciliation
Buildots and OpenSpace both work with imagery from construction sites. Buildots’ comparison against BIM and planned progress is central to its offering, while OpenSpace’s site capture and documentation provide a record teams can revisit. The overlap is collection, with different emphasis in what happens next.
FAQ
How can computer vision support construction progress tracking?
Site imagery can be compared with project plans to identify visible progress and discrepancies. The resulting assessment depends on image coverage and the quality of the reference model.
What role does BIM play in a construction digital twin?
Building information modeling provides a structured representation of the planned asset. Linking site observations to it helps relate physical progress to the plan.
Can site imagery establish that hidden construction work is complete?
Not reliably on its own. Covered or unobserved work may require inspections, records or additional evidence.
Why might Buildots’ round label differ between sources?
An official announcement may disclose the capital without assigning a series letter. A media-assigned label should remain attributed rather than be presented as an official designation.
Does a construction AI valuation measure project savings?
No. A financing valuation and measured savings on a building project describe different things and require separate evidence.
What affects the usefulness of automated site reporting?
Capture frequency, coverage, plan accuracy and how teams respond to flagged delays all affect whether observations lead to better decisions.